Jurisdiction of Courts and Enforcement of Judgments Act, 1998.

Proof and admissibility of certain judgments, documents and related translations.

12.—(1) For the purposes of the Conventions—

(a) a document that is duly authenticated and purports to be a copy of a judgment given by a court of a Contracting State other than the State shall, without further proof, be deemed to be a true copy of the judgment, unless the contrary is shown, and

(b) the original or any copy of a document mentioned in Article 46.2 or 47 of the 1968 Convention shall be admissible as evidence of any matter to which the document relates.

(2) A document purporting to be a copy of a judgment given by a court of a Contracting State, shall, for the purposes of this Act, be regarded as being duly authenticated if it purports—

(a) to bear the seal of that court, or

(b) to be certified by a judge or officer of that court to be a true copy of a judgment given by that court.

(3) A document shall be admissible as evidence of a translation if—

(a) it purports to be the translation of—

(i) a judgment given by a court of a Contracting State other than the State,

(ii) a document mentioned in Article 46.2, 47 or 50 of the 1968 Convention, or

(iii) a document containing a settlement referred to in Article 51 of the 1968 Convention or containing an arrangement referred to in Article 10 of the 1996 Accession Convention, and

(b) it is certified as correct by a person competent to do so.