Historic and Archaeological Heritage and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023
|
Inferences from failure or refusal to account for detection device | ||
|
180. (1) (a) Paragraph (b) applies where, in any proceedings against a person for the relevant offence, evidence is given that the accused— | ||
(i) at any time before he or she was charged with the offence, on being questioned by a member in relation to the offence, or | ||
(ii) when being charged with the offence or informed by a member that he or she might be prosecuted for it, | ||
was requested by the member to account for any detection device that was— | ||
(I) on his or her person, | ||
(II) in or on his or her clothing or footwear, | ||
(III) otherwise in his or her possession, or | ||
(IV) in any place in which he or she was during any specified period, | ||
and which the member reasonably believes may be attributable to the participation of the accused in the commission of the offence and the member informed the accused that the member so believes, and the accused failed or refused to give such account, being an account which, in the circumstances at the time, clearly called for an explanation from the accused when so questioned, charged or informed, as the case may be. | ||
(b) The court, in determining whether the charge should be dismissed under Part IA of the Criminal Procedure Act 1967 or whether there is a case to answer and the court (or, subject to the judge’s directions, the jury), in determining whether the accused is guilty of the relevant offence, may draw such inferences from the failure or refusal referred to in paragraph (a) as appear proper; and such failure or refusal may, on the basis of such inferences, be treated as, or as capable of amounting to, corroboration of any evidence in relation to which that failure or refusal is material. | ||
(2) A person shall not be convicted of the relevant offence solely or mainly on an inference drawn from a failure or refusal to account for a matter to which subsection (1) applies. | ||
(3) Subsection (1) shall not have effect unless— | ||
(a) the accused was told in ordinary language when being questioned, charged or informed, as the case may be, what the effect of the failure or refusal to account for a matter to which that subsection applies might be, and | ||
(b) the accused was afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult a solicitor before such failure or refusal occurred. | ||
(4) Nothing in this section shall, in any proceedings— | ||
(a) prejudice the admissibility in evidence of the silence or other reaction of the accused in the face of anything said in his or her presence relating to the conduct in respect of which he or she is charged in so far as evidence thereof would be admissible apart from this section, | ||
(b) be taken to preclude the drawing of any inference from the silence or other reaction of the accused which could properly be drawn apart from this section, or | ||
(c) be taken to preclude the drawing of any inference from a failure or refusal to account for the presence of any detection device which could properly be drawn apart from this section. | ||
(5) The court (or, subject to the judge’s directions, the jury) shall, for the purposes of drawing an inference under this section, have regard to whenever, if appropriate, the account of the matter concerned was first given by the accused. | ||
(6) This section shall not apply in relation to the questioning of a person by a member unless it is recorded by electronic or similar means or the person consents in writing to it not being recorded. | ||
(7) References in subsection (1) to evidence shall, in relation to the hearing of an application under Part IA of the Criminal Procedure Act 1967 for the dismissal of a charge, be taken to include a statement of the evidence to be given by a witness at the trial. | ||
(8) In this section— | ||
“member” means a member of the Garda Síochána; | ||
“relevant offence” means a contravention of section 148 (1)(f). |